SGET End Terminal: Field Performance
Real-world impact documentation from SGET guardrail end terminals in service. Each section below documents a separate site where an SGET End Terminal was impacted. Click any image to view full-size.
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)


.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)

.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)


Additional field performance documentation and MASH test reports available upon request. Contact us for complete technical packages.
Competitor System Sites
Documented sites involving competitor end terminal systems, presented for factual comparison alongside the SGET field record. Photo documentation is being compiled and will be published here.
What the Field Data Shows
The SGET End Terminal is engineered to perform consistently across a wide range of real-world impact scenarios. Field documentation consistently demonstrates:
- Terminal head assembly functions as designed during direct impacts
- Energy dissipation consistent with MASH TL-3 test results
- Structural containment maintained post-impact in documented cases
- RFID tags enable rapid post-impact identification and documentation
- Hot-dip galvanized components show excellent corrosion resistance after years in service
Correlation between laboratory MASH test performance (Tests 3-30 through 3-37) and field site data provides ongoing validation of the SGET’s design integrity. Full crash test video documentation and test reports are available on the SGET product page.
SGET in the Field
Real-world footage captured after a live highway impact event, showing the SGET terminal post-impact condition.